Marx ’ s Theory of Productive and Unproductive Labour 47
نویسنده
چکیده
This essay will attempt, first and foremost, a definitive exposition of Marx’s theory of productive and unproductive labour.1 This theory is presented in the three volumes of Capital and in Theories of Surplus Value—Marx’s projected historico-critical fourth volume.2 This seems useful and necessary for several reasons. First, as one of the most suspect legacies of classical political economy, its importance in Marxist political economy is disputed.3 As a result, it has not been accorded a central place in most expositions of Marx’s political economy, and its relation to the fundamental concept of surplus value has not been sufficiently emphasized.4 To anticipate, if the essential problem for Marx in his mature economic writings was the explanation of surplus value under capitalism, then, on any count, the distinction between productive labour which creates surplus value, and unproductive labour much of which is supported out of surplus value—this distinction is a critical one. Its analysis is the more urgent since several Marxist writers, notably Baran,5 have recently reinterpreted the concept in the course of focusing on the disposal and absorption of the surplus under Marx’s Theory of Productive and Unproductive Labour
منابع مشابه
The four 18 century streams on productive labour
This article first recalls our previous research on the original approach on productive labour, which goes from Petty to Genovesi (1767). That approach, being mainly empirical, divided jobs into more or less productive. The other most important approaches came later: Quesnay founded productive labour on surplus, Condillac on utility, Smith on exchange value. All of them gave the concept a more ...
متن کاملOver-accumulation, Rising Costs and 'Unproductive' Labour: The Relevance of the Classic Stationary State Issue for Developed Countries
The current crisis takes place within a long downturn. Forty years after publication of the Meadows report, new debates on the future of growth are emerging. The aim of this paper is to contribute to the general discussion on the prospects for economic growth in rich countries by stressing the relevance of some theoretical insights made by classical economists about the end of economic expansio...
متن کاملTesting Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship
Baumol's [Baumol, W.J., 1990. Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5), 893–921] theory of productive and unproductive entrepreneurship is a significant recent contribution to the economics of entrepreneurship literature. He hypothesizes that entrepreneurial individuals channel their effort in different directions depending on the quality o...
متن کاملSteve Fleetwood What Kind of Theory is Marx ’ s Labour Theory of Value ? A Critical
This paper uses critical realism to reflect upon the issue of theory in Marx‟s Labour Theory of Value (LTV). Like any theory, the LTV is rooted in a mode of theorisation. Rooting the LTV in an inappropriate (deductivist) mode of theorisation encourages the formulation of (quantitative) versions of the LTV that (a) have severe problems and (b) lack explanatory power. Conversely, rooting the LTV ...
متن کاملMarx’s objections to credit theories of money
right, or the power of demanding services in general, which may, or may not be commodities’ (Ibid: 35). The most advanced form of such transferable debt had no intrinsic value, typically paper, so the intrinsic value of silver or gold as money was ‘secondary’ (Ibid: 45). Gold and silver were only the most civilised of a lineage of representatives of labour, including shells and chocolate — clea...
متن کامل